Skill: agent-teams
Multi-agent team orchestration with native Agent Teams. Trigger when the user wants to launch a team of agents, coordinate parallel work with inter-agent communication, or use swarm mode.
Configuration
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Context | fork |
| Allowed tools | Read, Glob, Grep, Bash |
| Keywords | agent, teams, audit-team |
Detailed description
Agent Teams (Multi-Agent Orchestration)
Coordinate multiple Claude Code instances working together as a team, with shared tasks, inter-agent messaging, and centralized management.
Prerequisites
- Claude Code >= 2.1.19
- Feature flag enabled:
CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS - tmux (optional): for split-panes mode
Activation
Add to .claude/settings.local.json or .claude/settings.json:
{
"env": {
"CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS": "1"
}
}
Or via environment variable:
export CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1
When to use Agent Teams vs Sub-Agents
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ AGENT TEAMS vs SUB-AGENTS: DECISION GUIDE │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ AGENT TEAMS if: │
│ - Agents need to COMMUNICATE with each other │
│ - COMPLEX work requiring discussion and collaboration │
│ - Tasks with coordination (cross-review, debate, consensus) │
│ - 3+ agents working in parallel over a long duration │
│ │
│ SUB-AGENTS (Task tool) if: │
│ - FOCUSED task where only the result matters │
│ - No need for inter-agent communication │
│ - 1-2 agents for short tasks │
│ - Token economy is the priority │
│ │
│ MANUAL PARALLEL SESSIONS (git worktrees) if: │
│ - Full control over each session │
│ - No need for automatic coordination │
│ - Work on completely independent branches │
│ │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Comparison table
| Sub-Agents (Task) | Agent Teams | Manual sessions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context | Clean, result returned | Clean, independent | Clean, independent |
| Communication | Return to parent only | Direct messaging between agents | None (manual) |
| Coordination | Main agent handles everything | Shared task list | Manual |
| Token cost | Low | High (1 context per agent) | High |
| Ideal for | Focused tasks | Complex collaborative work | Independent branches |
Architecture
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ AGENT TEAM │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ TEAM LEAD │ ←── You interact with the lead │
│ │ (coordinates)│ │
│ └──────┬───────┘ │
│ │ │
│ ├──── Shared Task List ────┐ │
│ │ │ │
│ ┌─────┴─────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──┴───────┐ │
│ │ Teammate 1 │ │ Teammate 2│ │ Teammate 3│ │
│ │ (security) │ │ (perf) │ │ (a11y) │ │
│ └────────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ │
│ ↕ ↕ ↕ │
│ Direct messaging between agents │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
| Component | Role |
|---|---|
| Team Lead | Main session, creates the team, coordinates the work |
| Teammates | Independent Claude Code instances, execute the tasks |
| Task List | Shared list of tasks with statuses and dependencies |
| Mailbox | Messaging system for inter-agent communication |
Display modes
| Mode | Description | Prerequisites |
|---|---|---|
in-process | All teammates in the main terminal. Navigation: Shift+Up/Down | None |
tmux | Each teammate in its own tmux pane | tmux installed |
auto (default) | Split-panes if already in tmux, otherwise in-process | - |
Configuration in settings.json:
{
"teammateMode": "auto"
}
Or via command line:
claude --teammate-mode tmux
Keyboard shortcuts
| Shortcut | Action |
|---|---|
Shift+Up/Down | Navigate between teammates (in-process mode) |
Shift+Tab | Switch to delegate mode (lead = coordination only) |
Ctrl+T | Show/hide the task list |
Enter | Enter a teammate's session |
Escape | Interrupt a teammate's turn |
Team lifecycle
1. CREATE the team → Describe the task and desired structure
│
▼
2. SPAWN teammates → The lead creates the specialized agents
│
▼
3. COORDINATE → Shared tasks, messaging, delegation
│
▼
4. SYNTHESIZE → The lead combines the results
│
▼
5. SHUTDOWN → Stop each teammate cleanly
│
▼
6. CLEANUP → Clean up the team's resources
Launch example
Create a team of 3 agents to audit this project in parallel:
- A security agent (focus on OWASP Top 10)
- A performance agent (focus on Core Web Vitals)
- An accessibility agent (focus on WCAG 2.1 AA)
Each produces a report, then synthesize the results.
Delegate mode (recommended for teams > 3 agents)
Delegate mode prevents the lead from implementing itself, forcing it to stay in coordination:
- Activate with
Shift+Tabafter creating the team - The lead can only: spawn, send messages, manage tasks, shutdown
- Recommended when you want the lead to focus on orchestration
Best practices
- 2-5 teammates: beyond that, coordination becomes expensive in tokens
- 5-6 tasks per agent: enough to keep agents productive
- File isolation: each agent works on different files
- Explicit context: give a detailed prompt to each teammate at spawn
- Plan approval: for risky tasks, ask the lead to approve the plan before execution
- Regular monitoring: check progress, redirect if needed
Known limitations
| Limitation | Workaround |
|---|---|
| No resume for in-process teammates | The lead re-creates the team after /resume |
| Only one team per session | Cleanup before creating a new team |
| No nested teams | Only the lead can manage the team |
| Fixed lead (no transfer) | The creator stays lead for the whole duration |
| Two agents on the same file = overwrite | Split the work by file |
| Split-panes not supported in VS Code / Windows Terminal | Use in-process mode |
Pre-configured patterns
See @patterns.md for the 4 ready-to-use patterns:
| Pattern | Teammates | Use case |
|---|---|---|
| Audit | 3-4 agents (security, perf, a11y, design) | Full quality audit |
| Feature | 2-3 agents (frontend, backend, tests) | Multi-layer development |
| Debug | 3-5 agents (concurrent hypotheses) | Complex bug investigation |
| Review | 3 agents (security, perf, coverage) | Parallel code review |
Full example: Parallel audit
/work:work-team "Full project audit"
The lead will:
- Create an "audit-team"
- Spawn 3 teammates:
- security-reviewer: "Audit the code for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities. Focus on authentication, injections, and sensitive data."
- perf-analyst: "Analyze performance. Focus on slow queries, bundle size, and Core Web Vitals."
- a11y-checker: "Check WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility. Focus on contrast, keyboard navigation, and screen readers."
- Each agent works independently
- The lead synthesizes into a consolidated report
- Shutdown and cleanup
Full example: Feature as a team
/work:work-team "Implement the notifications system"
The lead will:
- Create the team and decompose the work:
- backend-dev: "Implement the notifications service in
src/services/notification.tsand the API endpoints." - frontend-dev: "Create the NotificationCenter component in
src/components/and the associated hooks." - test-writer: "Write the unit and integration tests for the notifications system."
- backend-dev: "Implement the notifications service in
- Manage dependencies via the task list (backend before frontend)
- The test-writer can start with the tests (TDD) while the devs are planning
- Merge once all agents are done
See also
- Skill
parallel-agentsfor orchestration via Task sub-agents - Skill
git-worktreesfor manual parallel sessions - Skill
session-handofffor context handoff between sessions /work:work-teamfor the direct launch command
Automatic triggering
This skill is automatically activated when:
- The matching keywords are detected in the conversation
- The task context matches the skill's domain
Triggering examples
- "I want to agent..."
- "I want to teams..."
- "I want to audit-team..."
Context fork
Fork means the skill runs in an isolated context:
- Does not pollute the main conversation
- Results are returned cleanly
- Ideal for autonomous tasks